The
Crestone Eagle, June 2007:
SLV Ecosystem Council files lawsuit against US Fish & Wildlife—asserts
public input required before Lexam is allowed to drill for gas on Refuge
—Alamosa
The San Luis Valley Ecosystem Council (SLVEC) has filed a
lawsuit against the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (U.S. F&WS)
regarding a Lexam Exploration Inc. (Lexam) proposal to drill
two 14,000-foot oil or gas test wells on the newly established
Baca National Wildlife Refuge (Baca NWR). Lexam’s website
(http://lexamexplorations.com/energy_projects.php) describes
the proposed project as “high risk” and “high
cost.”
SLVEC has filed suit to ensure that the public is fully informed
of Lexam’s drilling plans for the Baca NWR. SLVEC’s
suit seeks to ensure that a full range of alternatives and
mitigation measures are presented to the public before the
drilling project causes any further surface impacts to the
Baca NWR. The suit asks the Colorado Federal District Court
in Denver to ensure that impacts to the Baca NWR are not allowed
by the U.S. F&WS until after the public has had an opportunity
to participate in the formal decision making process mandated
by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
Lexam Explorations, Inc. owns some subsurface mineral rights
under the land which was purchased by the American public
and designated as the Baca National Wildlife Refuge. The Baca
NWR was purchased as part of the Great Sand Dunes National
Park and Preserve Act of 2000.
In July of 2006, Lexam informed the U.S. F&WS that Lexam
intends to drill two 14,000 ft. deep exploratory wells on
the refuge. Since this is a split-estate situation (surface
rights owned by the federal government and subsurface rights
by Lexam and others), the U.S.F&WS claimed that the federal
government could not prohibit Lexam from accessing the minerals
and therefore need not implement the informed decision making
and public participation mandates of NEPA.
SLVEC’s lawsuit asserts that U.S. F&WS has ample
legal authority to protect the Baca NWR, even where the minerals
are owned by a private company. Further, the lawsuit asserts
that not only does the U.S. F&WS have the legal duty to
implement NEPA, the public owners of these federal lands deserve
to have input into what happens on the Baca NWR.
Drilling in the unique conditions found in the San Luis Valley
raises questions about the impact that a 14,000-foot oil and
gas test well could have on underlying geologic and hydrologic
structures. The proposed drilling area lies near the Sangre
de Cristo fault line, and will pass through two aquifers.
The expected impacts to the groundwater in the Valley’s
closed-basin system are unknown.
The number of oil and gas well permits issued since 2002
has risen dramatically in the State of Colorado. In the San
Luis Valley, there are now over a hundred oil and gas leases
issued on federal lands outside the Baca NWR. The San Luis
Valley has seen little active drilling and this is the first
attempt at deep drilling on the Valley’s eastern edge.
Drilling could have a significant impact on wildlife refuge
habitat.
Biologic inventories have not been performed on Refuge lands.
At the Great Sand Dunes National Park, located adjacent to
the Baca National Wildlife Refuge, biologic inventories have
revealed areas of global biologic significance, including
at least twenty-eight rare, threatened, or endangered species,
including the globally imperiled slender spider flower. Colorado
Division of Wildlife (CDOW) biologists recently discovered
a genetically unique population of the endangered Rio Grande
sucker fish on the Baca National Wildlife Refuge. This population
is considered by CDOW to be critical to the recovery of the
species throughout the Rio Grande watershed.
SLVEC is a non-profit organization whose mission is to protect
and restore—through research, education, and advocacy—the
biological diversity, ecosystems, and natural resources of
the San Luis Valley and associated bioregion, balancing ecological
values and human needs. The Energy Minerals Law Center represents
communities impacted by energy mining and filed the lawsuit
on behalf of the SLVEC and its members.
Back to Archives
Page
Subscribe
to the Eagle! |